Committing blasphemy: A polemic against the Holy Book of lexicographers

Despite the profane wordings in title above, this paper will be a civilized and academic inquest into sacrosanct “compendium” world has come to venerate. Touted by lexicographer as panacea every linguistic worry, dictionary indeed become source of reference reverence from essentially walk life. This essay on other hand, direct contention with deeply erroneously held views laymen linguists alike, holding purpose interrogating deconstructing said through an integrationist lens. Integrationist linguistics, or Integrationism, calls stand institutionalized so-called “correct” Linguistics we know today, terms it “Segregationist linguistics” for its wrongful view language existing independent entity. acknowledges supports integration meaningful human activity. In specific context dictionary, uncover three major myths continually espoused lexicographer. The first these is misinformed veneration history etymology. We then move contradictory objectives such increasing, not reducing, semantic indeterminacy accomplished glossing many pages book. final key issue lies unrealistic attempt impose upon readers one-size-fits-all definitions which are just about all devoid contextualization, cases hold no relevance whatsoever experience person consulting Carrying aim resolving gaping holes, also shed light way forward approaching place holds within realm language.